These results were what inspired to further improve our product. We took on board every positive and negative and focused on enhancing the positives, whilst working on the negative aspects. The results were as followed:
Thursday, 25 April 2013
7) Looking back at your prelim task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
Looking back on our Preliminary task, and other rough cut videos you can see clear progression from each video with variation shots more apparent, more advanced, effective effects, titles and also a better sequence of events. All of these improvements have came from learning from the mistakes previously added in our preliminary task and rough cut videos.
Screenshots of our prelim task |
Firstly, I have learnt how my ideas for our product should be kept simple and not trying to do too much. Our preliminary task was a relatively simplistic idea, however the inexperience of our group and failure to make simple shots such as shot-reverse-shot very effective meant our preliminary task was in fact made quite complicated as the audience (classmates) were unable to identify what exactly was going on. We struggled with continuity in particular as simple shots, such as the shot-reverse-shot of me walking through the door, as I appeared more than three times in the film. Although when it came to making our first rough cut, we had mastered how to execute shot types well, yet I felt we got carried away by the chance of making a thriller film that we wanted to fit in as much footage as possible. Consequently, it was made into a very short story rather than an opening sequence which should give hints to what the film is about rather than telling the whole story. After analysing it as a group and then our target audience (classmates and other media students) they also felt that although our idea was good, we were trying to do far too much in 2 minutes and should try and keep it more simplistic. We also tried to add in more characters with Sarah and I having characters, however we felt although these characters could have a role in the latter of the film it didn’t fit the opening sequence as it came across far too confusing. This led to us as a group sitting down as a group and deciding what clips we liked, wanted to use and didn’t want need. This left us with clips of just Charlie (Antagonist) and Laura (Protagonist), reflecting what we set out to: create a conventional thriller opening sequence. I really liked the use of Charlie’s messed bedroom and the creepy stalking of Laura and wanted them to be used as our main clips. The progression of our preliminary task to our product now to me is really highlighted in the fact that we have learnt how to make the product, by going back to basics and making the opening sequence simplistic, rather than trying to create a story which happened in previous rough cuts and the prelim task.
close-up of Charlie, still a key feature of our product |
Character from 'Ripper Street' |
Overall, we have learnt greatly since the making of our very
ordinary and unprofessional preliminary task which didn’t carry a soundtrack,
any effects, or a real plot. However, as we gained more experience in
production field, we really began to progress from a very basic prelim task to
something far more effective with a specifically designed soundtrack, which had
a variation of Argentinian pianos and painful screams. Whilst a list of
effects, especially the use of colour correction which created a sinister
image, as colours of negative connotations were highlighted to indicate the
future. Subsequently, I believe this highlights what we have learnt a great
deal of experience and technique in the progression from our prelim task to our
full product.
6) What have you learnt about technologies in the process of constructing your film sequence?
Technology has been pivotal into the process of constructing
our product, from filming to editing; the technology has been a key element of
our film sequence.
An example of the tripod we used - vital for tilt and especially pan used when filming the Antagonist's bedroom |
Example of the HD HandyCam we used |
The second piece of technology we mainly used was Final Cut Pro on the Apple Mac, which enabled us to move our footage from our video camera (using a USB hard drive being plugged into our Mac) into Final Cut Pro; a movie making application. We had to import our clips into final cut pro where we could select certain clips to put into the project. This was excellent as it enabled us to review clips before placing them in, so we could be efficient in what clips were put in. When placing clips into a project it was a case of drag into the appropriate area which was very easy to do, saving time rather than having to re-import the clips onto the project. We could also adjust the size of the clip by clicking on the clip and shortening it until the length we want, therefore making it easier to edit our work.
Here is a screenshot of our work with Final Cut Pro |
Motion |
Motion+ is another software we used alongside Final Cut Pro. It enabled us to put in different templates of different titles for different characters. Actors were just given their name in the font (American Typewriter) with the effect which made it look like it was moving. This was done by selecting an effect to use. We felt this also reflected our genre as it seemed mysterious. Often in film, directors and other important roles e.g. Lighting, is given their department prior to their name, to highlight their importance. The Motion was trial and error initially before getting to grips with how it works and what meant what. We knew that all titles had to be kept within the inside blue square pictured in the below screenshot. This meant all titles were well within the frame and looking professional.
Soundtrack Pro |
This is a screenshot of our soundtrack on Final Cut Pro to see if the soundtrack fitted perfectly |
Before 'colour correct' |
5) Who would be the audience for your media product?
Our product is a thriller, thus it is to be expected to
carry a certain amount of suspense filled scenes and especially in our product
scenes which some viewers may see as disturbing due to the element of crime.
Consequently, it came to our attention that a BBFC certificate of 15 would be
suitable as the sinister elements in our product match the criteria of a 15
certificate, which is:
15 BBFC logo |
-strong violence,
frequent strong language, portrayals of sexual activity, strong verbal
references to sex, sexual nudity, brief scenes of sexual violence or verbal
references, discriminatory
language/behaviour, drug taking.
The criteria above was from the official BBFC site. From
this criteria we aimed our audience to be of 16-25 years old as we feel that
our product which carries a large proportion of the above elements for it to be
rewarded a 15 BBFC certificate. But we decided our main target audience to be
of 16-25 (students and young adults) as the composition of disturbing scenes
and a modern day setting would be ideal for the target audience of 16-25 year
olds.
Our audience was also
chosen by the choosing parts of society (demographics) who we feel would enjoy
and wish to watch our product the most, which we felt was students (hence the
age from 16+) and
casual workers, who may consist of graduated students who now have gone on to a
first full-time job which could make them included as a ‘casual worker’.
Subsequently, we chose the demographics of D, C1, C2, B and a making it
enjoyable for people of all backgrounds. Another way of selecting our target
audience was by choosing what sort of individuals we would like our product to
attract from a shortlist of different types of thrill-seekers. From the list we choose ‘Strugglers’ who
escape from reality, and ‘Explorers’ who seek discovery and predict the course
of the events in the film. These two types of thrill-seekers were chosen using
Physco-graphics as ‘Strugglers’ would represent Laura and ‘Explorers’ would
enjoy the product as the various enigma codes employed means it implies what is
to come in the film, which of course Explorers seek.
4) What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Film 4 logo |
Our product is a relatively cheap (£10 spent on props) , British film which doesn’t
require too many expensive scenes using special effects, as the majority of our
product is filmed in already built and ready to use. This perfectly fits the
mould of ‘Film 4’, a British institution, owned by Channel Four Television
Corporation. Film 4 was made in 1982 and has now gone on to become a major part
of the majority of UK films, or smaller budget worldwide films. This small
budget and focus on British films would be perfectly suited for our film which
is set in Britain and relatively cheap in expense with the majority of scenes
set in already made scenes. Although
Film 4 tends to focus on mainly British audience we feel that our product has
such classic conventions it has the potential to go multinational.
Why would Film 4 be a suitable choice for our media
product?
Film 4 tends to base itself on less expensive and more low
key (often British) films which perhaps doesn't require such expensive effects
and scenes to make the film effective. I believe that our film would be more
likely to suit the criteria of Film 4 as our film too does not use many hi-tech
effects. Also our film is set in Britain, in generally public places, thus no
money is needed to hire out expensive scenes and no travelling is needed.
Overall, I believe our film tends to suit the criteria of a Film 4 film,
therefore I feel that if we were to adopt Film 4 as our institute it would
advertise our film well. Subsequently, we took a recording from the Film 4
introduction to films and placed it in ours to give our product a very
professional look.
Film 4's British blockbuster 'Attack The Block':
Film 4's British blockbuster 'Attack The Block':
3) How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Voldemort (Antagonist) is a male and also wearing black |
Our media product does represent particular social groups in the form of stereotypes in males and females especially, similar to that of TV show, ‘Skins’. Stereotypically men are foreseen as more aggressive, more capable of sinister activity, therefore more likely to be the criminal, Antagonist, hence our decision for Charlie to be the Antagonist. Throughout TV, and film men are often stereotyped as being the Antagonist due to their stereotyped aggression, physically stronger and more intimidating. An example is Voldermort (although not a thriller); a male is still depicted as the most evil, aggressive, wicked, bloodthirsty character than any other. By Charlie being used as our Antagonist, it will match the classic convention of a male Antagonist as well as stereotypical view of men. Charlie is 17 also, therefore a teenager, a social group which falls under great scrutiny and stereotypical views. In costume, Charlie is depicted often wearing black; this carries negative connotations of death, and evil, as often in film we see the ‘dark side vs the good side’, with the evil as black and good as a heaven-like white. An example would be the evil force in 'Harry Potter', that is Voldemort. The stereotypical teenager is moody, aggressive, and rebellious, therefore this creates an effective Antagonist as a male teenager creates a conventional violent, Antagonist.
On the other hand, Laura is our Protagonist. Protagonists stereotypically are females who are often seen as weaker, vulnerable, and dependent on others which makes the perfect base for an Protagonist who are of course are put into frightening situations due to their
'Chrissie' (Protagonist) has blonde hair and is depicted as vulnerable and in danger |
The video depicts them as aggressive due to the constant swearing of each character, but also disrespectful.
2) How did you attract your audience?
Johnny Depp as the eccentric, 'Madhatter', in the contemporary Alice in Wonderland |
Thriller lovers often like to know what they are going to
see before watching the thriller product. Therefore prior to the making of our
film we knew we would have to adopt certain thriller conventions which would
then draw in those dedicated fans to watch and then enjoy our product. Often
film fans enjoy to watch specific films with similar actors which has a
repetition of genre codes, as they know if their favourite actor was in the
film, the genre would be what they also enjoy. An example of a repetition in
genre and actors would be Johnny Depp who is often depicted as a mad-character
in films.
We decided to attract the proportion of thriller lovers to
our film by providing the classic conventions of a thriller films: male
Antagonist (Charlie), vulnerable, female Protagonist (Laura), props (voodoo doll), lighting on only
one side of Charlie’s face showed is evil nature. We felt that all this in total would reflect
our bid to create a crime-thriller, similar to ‘Se7en’. ‘Se7en’ uses quite ‘real’
footage, as there is a more realistic approach (less effects). From research,
there is a quite large market of crime-thriller hybrids, thus we needed to use
something for our product to stand out. Thus we wanted to enhance the sinister
element of our product by using colour correction. The colour correction
enhanced/altered the original colours, creating Laura’s face (when dead) seem
more grey and cold as if she was really dead, whilst it further emphasised the
colour red on the voodoo doll to depict and convey the image of danger. We decided to combine both an urban
atmosphere of a messy bedroom, showing signs of madness, but also natural
settings to show this evil activity could happen anywhere. The messy bedroom
was constructed in a fake bedroom at college whilst the footage of Laura
walking was filmed at the ‘Belstead Brook’, Suffolk, which looked very isolated
in footage. This was effective as it implied something pessimistic was in the
offing. Our audience may like this as it offers something different to the
modern crime-thrillers, but also creates the tension of ‘this could happen
anywhere!’. Our use of characters was also carefully selected to mirror classic
conventions of a thriller. Charlie (male) was the Antagonist, often depicted as
men in film, and Laura (female), a young, slightly vulnerable and naive 17 year
old as the Protagonist. Laura’s blonde hair made her seem fair and innocent; an
easy target for a mad-man played by Charlie who has strong facial features, and
dark hair. Charlie’s movement during the sequence is peculiar and his movement
conveys thoughts of someone who looked up to no good. Charlie throughout the product is depicted
wearing black, which has connotation of death and evil. Whilst Laura’s fair
hair, and light cotton jumpers show innocence and vulnerability.
'Belstead Brook' on Google Maps |
Results of our question regarding equilibrium |
The results of the questionnaire and research meant we were
able to attract the exact audience we wanted to get.
1) In what way does your media product use, develop and challenge forms and conventions of real media products, e.g. existing films, hybrid?
The media product we have created is in the ‘thriller’ genre
which is ’Thriller Film is a genre
that revolves around anticipation and suspense. The aim for Thrillers is to
keep the audience alert and on the edge of their seats. The protagonist in
these films is set against a problem – an escape, a mission, or a mystery.’
(source: http://thescriptlab.com/screenplay/genre/thriller)
.Our media product revolves around classic conventions inspired by real media
products such as ‘Se7en’, a thriller starring Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman. We
were inspired by Se7en due to its very original opening sequence with a long
line of close-ups of the anonymous Antagonist, and detailed close-ups of props
including books, papers etc. Before filming, we composed a list of conventions
and props in which we would like to include as the centrepiece to our product.
This included:
Colleague of Se7en- shows some key props |
-
Cameras – makes audience think ‘what is on the
camera?’ and ‘why is he taking photos?’
-
Laptop – raises the question of ‘what is on the
laptop?’
-
Messy room – suggests the Antagonist is losing
the plot
-
Antagonist close ups- reveals the identity of
the mad-man, makes the audience now when this face appears, danger is in the
offing
-
Prop close-ups – to highlight the importance of the props to the product
|
-
Voodoo doll- shows the ambition and want of the
antagonist (bloodlust), as well as creating suspense and a sense of
intimidation.
However, since the progression of our media product from the
rough cut to the final piece, there has been a slow change in the choice of
conventions. Originally, we had used the Protagonist (Laura) scarf as a main
enigma code by placing it upon a barbed wire- which has a connotation of
imprisonment and danger, due to the sharp aesthetics of the wire. Nevertheless,
after reanalysing the rough cut and getting feedback from our class and other
media students we felt that there was a great deal of work needed to develop
and improve our product. First of all, prior to the making of our product we as
a group concluded that our conventions needed developing, and decided to also
implement more props and enigma codes, whilst footage of Laura walking was
slowly eliminated as it seemed irrelevant and didn’t suit the purpose of our
product: to thrill. Consequently, we decided to compile a new list of
conventions. We decided to keep the camera as a prop as it made the audience
query what the Antagonist may be using it for/have on it, the messy room was to
be used more as it created an element of madness, however we decided that the
main convention of our product should be close-ups of the Antagonist and
Protagonist. We believed that the convention of the close-ups (similar to
Se7en), possibly overlaying for the audience to establish the link of danger,
would be very effective.
We feel that our development of props, enigma codes in the
form of conventions has made our production far more effective and successful,
as we feel it has achieved its main purposes: to thrill and produce clear,
precise titles. Each and every convention employed has a purpose behind it from
props to the titles used, which reflect the type of product our film is…a
crime/thriller. A crime/thriller is a
thriller hybrid which combines an element of crime such as murder, theft as a
centrepiece of it but an element of thrill is added in to create suspense and
make the film seem much more dramatic. Our product revolves around the criminal
activity of the Antagonist and death of the Protagonist Laura (with more to
follow in the rest of the film), therefore our film easily fits into the
category of the crime thriller hybrid.
With the murder of Laura depicted within the opening sequence it is
clear that our product is a crime thriller hybrid. Furthermore, the merge of
two genres into one means that we can broaden our audience as some people may
prefer crime to thriller (vice versa), but our product enables to compliment
both genres. Each prop, title and camera shot reflects the crime thriller
hybrid of our product. The conventions we have assembled have reflected the
crime element in our thriller.
Broken Developments - Final Cut
This is the Final Cut of our thriller product: 'Broken Developments'
Sunday, 14 April 2013
Change in Name and Change of Product
It became apparent to us as a group that the name of our thriller, 'Mr Grevor', wasn't very suitable to our thriller product.
Originally, we thought 'Mr Grevor' would be a good name for our product as the name is somewhat, very unfamiliar, unusual, that would mirror the Antagonist character's (Charlie) behavior. Subsequently, enhancing Charlie's character as very peculiar, odd and strange to imply the work he is going to do is odd and sinister, indicating his work is something not right. However, after discussion we felt this was a bit too far fetched as the audience may not have understood the meaning and infer what we had.
Consequently, we decided to rename the product 'Broken Developments'. Firstly, we felt the name had more of a ring to it and sounds more professional as the name sounds more custom made . Secondly, a regular theme and prop in our product is the footage of cameras, throughout the opening sequence we see numerous close-ups of the camera. Of course, cameras produce negatives which are then developed into photographs, thus the link can be made between the title and the 'developments' from the pictures taken by the camera. Furthermore, in one of the pan shots you can see the many negatives needing to be developed. Whilst 'broken' indicates something is not right with the photos being developed, maybe the developments are broken or the photos are evil and twisted.
The plan of our product has changed on plenty of occasions. Previously, we decided to introduce two new characters: Sarah as another Protagonist and myself as a confused detective. However, we felt that this was going to end up resulting in the previous results of our previous attempts, and that was the telling of a story...which an opening sequence should not do. The definition of an opening sequence is:
"A title sequence is the method by which cinematic films or television programs present their title, key production and cast members, or both, utilizing conceptual visuals and sound"
It was felt by us, as a group, and a class as a whole that our product did match the criteria of announcing cast members, and excelled in visuals and sound. However, this definition clearly shows how an opening sequence should not tell a story, but simply introduce the film and give the audience an idea of the genre, actors etc. Consequently, the introduction of the 2 new characters went against this outline of an opening sequence. Therefore, we went back to the drawing board.
The type of thriller was kept the same: crime-thriller hybrid. We decided to keep it to two characters: Charlie (Antagonist) and Laura (Protagonist), to stop telling a story and build up of confusion. We filtered through good footage, and footage which was and wasn't needed was deleted, giving us the core of our sequence. From this, we focused on the footage of Charlie - predominately close-ups of his face, and bedroom, whilst close-ups of Laura dead and innocently walking the dog.
Effects also changed as we decided to place more emphasis on colour correction which highlighted specific colours e.g. red which has connotations of evil and blood. Whilst layover was also used some more as it created a clear link between Charlie and the deceased Laura.
Previously, our titles were effective and were in fantastic proximity of the frame, yet we wanted the effects to stand off the screen more, thus the software 'Motion' was employed. It enabled us to create some effective and professional looking titles, which is a vital part of the definition quoted above.
Our Soundtrack was also changed to enhance the effect. Previously we used a futuristic, quite alien-like drone noise, but we discovered that an Argentinean Piano noise was extremely effective. We agreed that all of our soundtrack should be non-diegetic as we felt it would effect the impact of the titles. This Piano was used alongside fade to bring in a drone-like noise, to imply when Charlie is present, this tension building non-diegetic noise would imply something was going to occur. Whilst an 'impact' sound was used alongside impact to make the audience feel shocked and be on-the-edge of their seats. Non-diegetic screams further enhanced tension and element of worry within the audience.
The plan of our product has changed on plenty of occasions. Previously, we decided to introduce two new characters: Sarah as another Protagonist and myself as a confused detective. However, we felt that this was going to end up resulting in the previous results of our previous attempts, and that was the telling of a story...which an opening sequence should not do. The definition of an opening sequence is:
"A title sequence is the method by which cinematic films or television programs present their title, key production and cast members, or both, utilizing conceptual visuals and sound"
It was felt by us, as a group, and a class as a whole that our product did match the criteria of announcing cast members, and excelled in visuals and sound. However, this definition clearly shows how an opening sequence should not tell a story, but simply introduce the film and give the audience an idea of the genre, actors etc. Consequently, the introduction of the 2 new characters went against this outline of an opening sequence. Therefore, we went back to the drawing board.
The type of thriller was kept the same: crime-thriller hybrid. We decided to keep it to two characters: Charlie (Antagonist) and Laura (Protagonist), to stop telling a story and build up of confusion. We filtered through good footage, and footage which was and wasn't needed was deleted, giving us the core of our sequence. From this, we focused on the footage of Charlie - predominately close-ups of his face, and bedroom, whilst close-ups of Laura dead and innocently walking the dog.
Effects also changed as we decided to place more emphasis on colour correction which highlighted specific colours e.g. red which has connotations of evil and blood. Whilst layover was also used some more as it created a clear link between Charlie and the deceased Laura.
Previously, our titles were effective and were in fantastic proximity of the frame, yet we wanted the effects to stand off the screen more, thus the software 'Motion' was employed. It enabled us to create some effective and professional looking titles, which is a vital part of the definition quoted above.
Our Soundtrack was also changed to enhance the effect. Previously we used a futuristic, quite alien-like drone noise, but we discovered that an Argentinean Piano noise was extremely effective. We agreed that all of our soundtrack should be non-diegetic as we felt it would effect the impact of the titles. This Piano was used alongside fade to bring in a drone-like noise, to imply when Charlie is present, this tension building non-diegetic noise would imply something was going to occur. Whilst an 'impact' sound was used alongside impact to make the audience feel shocked and be on-the-edge of their seats. Non-diegetic screams further enhanced tension and element of worry within the audience.
Thursday, 14 February 2013
Institution Research
Film 4
Film 4 is a British film institution, owned by Channel Four Television Corporation. Film 4 began in 1982 and since has gone onto be a major part of the majority of films made in the UK, or smaller budget worldwide films. Film 4 had previously tried to break into Hollywood territory by widening their budget to improve the quality of films and propose potential 'blockbusters'. However, Channel 4 had to cut their budget from the £30m, which they wanted to use to break into Hollywood, had to be cut to £10m following a failure to do so.
Film 4 tends to base itself on less expensive and more low key (often British) films which perhaps doesn't require such expensive effects and scenes to make the film effective. I believe that our film would be more likely to suit the criteria of Film 4 as our film too does not use many hi-tec effects and therefore would suit Film 4. Also our film is set in Britain, in generally public places, thus no money is needed to hire out expensive scenes and no travelling is needed. Overall, I believe our film tends to suit the criteria of a Film 4 film, therefore I feel that if we were to adopt Film 4 as our institute it would advertise our film well.
UK film council
UK film council was set up in 2000 by the Labour government in the hope of the development and promotion of the film industry in the UK. It is a private company limited by guarantee governed by a15 directors and was funded through the National Lottery. Since it's formation there has been than £160m of lottery to over 900 films.The Development Fund aimed to broaden the quality, range and ambition of film projects being developed in the UK. With £12 million of Lottery funding to invest over three years, the fund aimed to build a talent-driven home for writers, directors and producers. It helped filmmakers of all experience levels develop their ideas and screenplays into viable feature films, be they fiction, documentary or animation, up until the moment they were ready to get production finance.
Film 4 is a British film institution, owned by Channel Four Television Corporation. Film 4 began in 1982 and since has gone onto be a major part of the majority of films made in the UK, or smaller budget worldwide films. Film 4 had previously tried to break into Hollywood territory by widening their budget to improve the quality of films and propose potential 'blockbusters'. However, Channel 4 had to cut their budget from the £30m, which they wanted to use to break into Hollywood, had to be cut to £10m following a failure to do so.
Film 4 tends to base itself on less expensive and more low key (often British) films which perhaps doesn't require such expensive effects and scenes to make the film effective. I believe that our film would be more likely to suit the criteria of Film 4 as our film too does not use many hi-tec effects and therefore would suit Film 4. Also our film is set in Britain, in generally public places, thus no money is needed to hire out expensive scenes and no travelling is needed. Overall, I believe our film tends to suit the criteria of a Film 4 film, therefore I feel that if we were to adopt Film 4 as our institute it would advertise our film well.
UK film council
UK film council was set up in 2000 by the Labour government in the hope of the development and promotion of the film industry in the UK. It is a private company limited by guarantee governed by a15 directors and was funded through the National Lottery. Since it's formation there has been than £160m of lottery to over 900 films.The Development Fund aimed to broaden the quality, range and ambition of film projects being developed in the UK. With £12 million of Lottery funding to invest over three years, the fund aimed to build a talent-driven home for writers, directors and producers. It helped filmmakers of all experience levels develop their ideas and screenplays into viable feature films, be they fiction, documentary or animation, up until the moment they were ready to get production finance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)