Looking back on our Preliminary task, and other rough cut videos you can see clear progression from each video with variation shots more apparent, more advanced, effective effects, titles and also a better sequence of events. All of these improvements have came from learning from the mistakes previously added in our preliminary task and rough cut videos.
Screenshots of our prelim task |
Firstly, I have learnt how my ideas for our product should be kept simple and not trying to do too much. Our preliminary task was a relatively simplistic idea, however the inexperience of our group and failure to make simple shots such as shot-reverse-shot very effective meant our preliminary task was in fact made quite complicated as the audience (classmates) were unable to identify what exactly was going on. We struggled with continuity in particular as simple shots, such as the shot-reverse-shot of me walking through the door, as I appeared more than three times in the film. Although when it came to making our first rough cut, we had mastered how to execute shot types well, yet I felt we got carried away by the chance of making a thriller film that we wanted to fit in as much footage as possible. Consequently, it was made into a very short story rather than an opening sequence which should give hints to what the film is about rather than telling the whole story. After analysing it as a group and then our target audience (classmates and other media students) they also felt that although our idea was good, we were trying to do far too much in 2 minutes and should try and keep it more simplistic. We also tried to add in more characters with Sarah and I having characters, however we felt although these characters could have a role in the latter of the film it didn’t fit the opening sequence as it came across far too confusing. This led to us as a group sitting down as a group and deciding what clips we liked, wanted to use and didn’t want need. This left us with clips of just Charlie (Antagonist) and Laura (Protagonist), reflecting what we set out to: create a conventional thriller opening sequence. I really liked the use of Charlie’s messed bedroom and the creepy stalking of Laura and wanted them to be used as our main clips. The progression of our preliminary task to our product now to me is really highlighted in the fact that we have learnt how to make the product, by going back to basics and making the opening sequence simplistic, rather than trying to create a story which happened in previous rough cuts and the prelim task.
close-up of Charlie, still a key feature of our product |
Character from 'Ripper Street' |
Overall, we have learnt greatly since the making of our very
ordinary and unprofessional preliminary task which didn’t carry a soundtrack,
any effects, or a real plot. However, as we gained more experience in
production field, we really began to progress from a very basic prelim task to
something far more effective with a specifically designed soundtrack, which had
a variation of Argentinian pianos and painful screams. Whilst a list of
effects, especially the use of colour correction which created a sinister
image, as colours of negative connotations were highlighted to indicate the
future. Subsequently, I believe this highlights what we have learnt a great
deal of experience and technique in the progression from our prelim task to our
full product.
No comments:
Post a Comment